“Get ready for The Next Big Thing” because “everyone is doing it!” OK…product promotion or wishful thinking? Well, probably a bit of both but it seems that the line between objective commentary and self-promotion remains blurred, to put it kindly.
With LinkedIn seemingly morphed into Facebook 2.0, it provides a fun forum for hordes of self-appointed trend-setters aggressively peddling their wares with exotic predictions, declarations and often shamelessly false claims as to “what business wants” and “how the market is evolving”. But what stands out most from this deluge of posts – aside from the absolutism with which their claims are made – is that they are all usually made by parties offering those solutions being announced.
I have read that “Zoom” is here to stay, apparently. “Tele-marketing is dead” too, apparently…both claims made from the keyboards of those who prefer not to travel or pick up the phone, no doubt.
In the 90’s fax marketing became ‘a thing’ and its cheerleaders – those parties providing fax broadcasting services – predicted it would replace traditional mail. It didn’t.
Then email marketing became The Next Big Thing and its cheerleaders – again, those parties providing e-broadcast services – confidently predicted it would replace all other traditional forms of business communications. But it didn’t.
Then Social Media exploded onto the scene. Funnily enough, yet again their cheerleaders – those parties providing social media solutions – all predicted it would replace email and all other existing marketing channels…and again, it just didn’t.
While nobody can deny the ups and downs of market share throughout the evolution of direct marketing, the vocabulary employed by the various channel providers often verges on flat-out dishonest, doubtless fuelled by the market’s ravenous appetite for trends, fashions and the next passing bandwagon.
So where does a balanced multi-channel approach to a campaign stand with the cult of The Next Big Thing so aggressively dominating the conversation?